Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pottercast

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy Deleted as recreation of previously deleted content.

Capitalistroadster 04:41, 3 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Pottercast

This article was previously deleted under the name PotterCast (record is here). Per CSD G4, this should be a Speedy because it is previously deleted material. Same reasons as first deletion, not notable. Jtmichcock 03:05, 3 December 2005 (UTC)

• Speedy delete G4. -- Saikiri~ 03:58, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
• Comment. Speedy? Whoa. I'm not qualified to vote on this, but I do see a lot of Google hits, and according to The Leaky Cauldron (website) "[Pottercast] reached number one on the iTunes Music Store in its first few days online, and has been in the top 100 since." Is that significant (and true)? If so, does it indicate notability? On the other hand, Mugglecast occurs one a week; the next Pottercast is scheduled for Summer 2006. Herostratus 04:04, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
  • As far as I am aware, PotterCast has never hit #1 on iTunes, Mugglecast holds that distinction (and MuggleCast is a featured podcast on iTunes). Nonetheless, the article "PotterCast" (note capital C) was nominated and deleted last week after a vote and the only difference between the articles is the capital C. Jtmichcock 04:10, 3 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.