Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Posette

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was REDIRECT to Poser. Yuser31415 06:34, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Posette

Posette (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

We are not a dictionary. —— Eagle101 ^{Need help?} 03:26, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. Doesn't seem to be that common from a Google search. --Wafulz 03:40, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - people need to understand that WP:WINAD --Haemo 06:27, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
• OK, OK, redirect to Poser. Anthony Appleyard 07:46, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - Definitely. If you want to edit on a real dictionary, see Wiktionary. Auroranorth 11:04, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
• Redirect Doesn't seem like a classical dictionary entry to me. Trivia maybe. Redirect seems fine.Intinn^Talk! 11:20, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete WP:WINAD. dcandeto 16:50, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
• Redirect to Poser, because redirects are cheap. In the alternative, Delete.-- danntm ^T _C 21:17, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
• Redirect to poser, works as a possible search term. SkierRMH 01:02, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
• Redirect to Poser per SkierRMH. May be searched. -- Black Falcon 04:07, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.