Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Portal Paradoxes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 03:44, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Portal Paradoxes

Essay; original research. Does not appear these problems could be fixed. Allen 15:04, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

• I agree, doesn't even make a pretext of referring to a physical law. --Zeizmic 15:28, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - runs afoul of WP:OR and WP:V. (I expect this to change after I complete filing patents of technology based on the theories in this article.) My Alt Account 15:44, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as unencyclopedic original research. --Ed (Edgar181) 15:53, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nomination. Lincolnite 16:06, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per nom--Whpq 17:30, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
• The article discusses science fiction as if it were real science: "either situation is theretically possible and as neither has ever happened before no one can say otherwise. (Although if some one has the expertise on this subject it would be great if you could shed some light on the subjetct)." Experts on the subject are called physicists, and we have an article on wormholes that not only sheds light on the subject but explains in its second sentence that this article is rubbish. original research. Delete. Uncle G 18:07, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete dumb. Danny Lilithborne 18:14, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as original research essay. It seems to be about the video games Narbacular Drop and Portal — the first revision mentions them. Which means that even if it was cleaned up and clarified, it'd fall under Wikipedia is not an instruction manual. -- Plutortalkcontribs 19:06, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per above comments. Anger22 22:56, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete since we can't even be sure what it's supposed to be. Game instructions seems most likely, which comes under Wikipedia is not an instruction manual and possibly copyright violation. Peter Grey 23:48, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per all of the above. Michael Kinyon 11:38, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.