Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pokemon wi-fi communities

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was already deleted. GRBerry 12:55, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Pokemon wi-fi communities

NN Computerjoe's talk 21:55, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. -Justin (koavf)·T·C·M 21:58, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete - It is non-notable, and speculative ("explosion might occur"). However, that may be the least helpful nomination I have ever seen; 2 letters do not an AfD make! Ruaraidh-dobson 22:00, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete - non-notable, non-encyclopedic. Akradecki 22:05, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

• Do Not Delete - a neutral perspective on true virtual event: importance should not be limited to only physical reality, but also virtual.

^{Previous unsigned comment by Thegreatjar -- Ruaraidh-dobson 22:23, 30 August 2006 (UTC) Struck original opinion per new opinion below by the same contributor. GRBerry 00:45, 31 August 2006 (UTC)}

• Delete, reads too much like advertising for the two websites mentioned in the bulk of the article, which fail WP:WEB miserably... hosted at VirtuaBoard and Freewebs? No way. --Kinu ^t/_c 22:48, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Now that I read it more carefully, it does sound like advertising. Please delete it for the welfare of Wikipedia. A property of wikipedia: "it is not a site that specializes in linking to other web sites and categorizing those links.' -thegreatjar —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Thegreatjar (talk • contribs) .
  • Comment: I've tagged as {{db-author}} per this comment. --Kinu ^t/_c 02:25, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. Dancter 01:02, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.