Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pokemon Snap DS

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete Renata 06:15, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Pokemon Snap DS

Pokemon Snap DS (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

If this game was by some reliable source to be currently in development, it would certainly be worth of an article. But as it stands, the only proof of this game's existence is a blurry picture that may be a hoax. See Talk:Pokemon Snap DS. Coffee 03:42, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

• Keep Pending confirmation. Sharkface217 04:41, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Wikipedia is NOT a crystal ball. I can't find anything from a quick google search that verifies this game's existence. If it does appear, the article should be reinstated, but at the moment it looks like a hoax.Mister Pe 05:20, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. MER-C 06:03, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - If it is real there is zero danger that it won't eventually be covered, I mean a video game and pokemon? How coudl we miss it? Dalf | Talk 07:34, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions. -- Scogdv 15:44, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as WP:NOT a crystal ball. Darkspots 20:36, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete until more information concerning the game is released. --Gray Porpoise_{Your wish is my command!} 21:03, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete pending confirmation. — Haeleth Talk 21:40, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per all above. No way it will be missed if/when confirmed. Angus McLellan (Talk) 21:10, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as a hoax, no such game has been announced. TJ Spyke 02:37, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete can't find independent confirmation - and even if it were there, is this really utile/eneyclopedic? SkierRMH,08:42, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.