Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pokegods
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was redirect to Pokémon (video games). --Celestianpower háblame 22:42, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Pokegods
Subtrivial fancruft that most Pokemon fans wouldn't be interested in. What little information that 'needs' to be covered is detailed in Pokémon (video games)#Codes and glitches and its subsections. Saberwyn 05:30, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. As per noimination. Saberwyn 05:30, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, as I'm having trouble finding any assertions of fact in this article. Pokémon (video games) already covers this. - A Man In Black (conspire | past ops) 08:02, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. glitches are already covered in the main Pokemon article. --Optichan 16:54, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
- Merge - as usual, no deletion required. The redirect could be useful to someone. Trollderella 17:58, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
- Yeah, I was planning to replace this with a redirect anyway. Not sure why I didn't mention that. - A Man In Black (conspire | past ops) 04:42, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
- Well, it's mentioned now. And I'm thinking a redirect may be appropriate as well. --Optichan 16:16, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
- While I'm thinking about it, Pokégods should also redirect to Pokémon (video games). In the exceedingly unlikely event that this article is kept, the redirect I'm making right now should be deleted, and this article should be moved to Pokégods. - A Man In Black (conspire | past ops) 16:26, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
- Well, it's mentioned now. And I'm thinking a redirect may be appropriate as well. --Optichan 16:16, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
- Yeah, I was planning to replace this with a redirect anyway. Not sure why I didn't mention that. - A Man In Black (conspire | past ops) 04:42, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
