Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pokémon The Evil Inside

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Titoxd^{(?!? - help us)} 00:24, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Pokémon The Evil Inside

Non-notable gamecruft. Created by an individual using RPG Maker. Won non-notable awards. —Cuiviénen, Friday, 28 April 2006 @ 03:42 UTC

• Delete - agree with nom. Wickethewok 03:50, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
• The link for The Misao Awards is incorrectly connected to the RPG Maker page. Does this mean these awards were fabricated by the articles author? Mordecai121 03:55, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Response - there are comments and a link in that article regarding these awards; however, they do not see to have any validity or importance behind them. For all the information on their website, it could be some arbitrary guy. Wickethewok 03:59, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
  • There is a brief mention of the awards at the end of the RPG Maker article. I don't know enough to say if that mention should be removed (if it is also non-notable), but having won one of those awards certainly doesn't seem to make a game notable. —Cuiviénen, Friday, 28 April 2006 @ 04:02 UTC
• Delete per nominator. JIP | Talk 07:51, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Only slightly better than fanfic as far as notability goes. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 11:26, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, Pokemoncruft. --Terence Ong 11:37, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Per above. "Pokemoncruft". Beno1000 23:08, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. PJM 01:58, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
• No comment, It's a fangame but there's a few other fangames already on wikipedia, so I would consider that, too. And for god's sake, "pokemoncruft", you people and that godforsaken word! Toastypk 17:35, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.