Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Poe's Law

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 02:54, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Poe's Law

Neologism. 48 hits on Google, half of which are unrelated (related to Edgar Allen, for example). Klaw ¡digame! 19:43, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

• Nothing wrong with neologisms. Without them we'd still be conversing in Greek. Latin or Aramaic. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.210.31.8 (talk • contribs) 19:53, 20 December 2005.
  • User's first edit. | Klaw ¡digame! 20:05, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Nothing wrong with them at all. But they don't get articles on Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a dictionary. | Klaw ¡digame! 20:05, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
    • Note that this is not a new word, it is a new hypothesis. Uncle G 03:04, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
• No, of course there's nothing unright about quasilexical logomancy, particularly in our cybertrophic, auxilexic transomnitopia. Moreover, "Yakka foob mog. Grub pubblewunk zing watoom gazork. Chumble spuzz." DIS-CREATIFY! Anville 20:15, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as not suitable for an encyclopedia entry. Edgar181
• Delete. I still sometimes converse in Greek with my wife. Flyboy Will 22:04, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete --Quarl 11:47, 24 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.