Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PixelAddiction

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Titoxd^(?!?) 01:48, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] PixelAddiction

Wikipedia is not an advertising service. Promotional articles about yourself, your friends, your company or products; or articles created as part of a marketing or promotional campaign, may be deleted in accordance with our deletion policies. For more information, see Wikipedia:Spam.

• Delete spam --IslaySolomon 04:42, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
• "Keep' It sounds like an interesting and useful site. A bit of editing (assuming the article is kept) would fix the NPOV problems. --TruthbringerToronto 04:50, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete not really much here but POV. Don't see enough notability that it could have a decent npov article. -Goldom ‽‽‽ ⁂ 04:53, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete spam. Page creator has a history of spamming to this site. Fireplace 04:55, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, fails WP:SPAM and WP:NPOV. Block the creator for spamming the website. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 05:45, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Biased advertising for a non-notable website, WP:WEB, WP:SPAM & WP:NPOV all refer.  (aeropagitica)  (talk)  06:14, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete vanispamcruftisement. Danny Lilithborne 06:53, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Smerdis of Tlön 15:30, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
• STRONG KEEP if not a Speedy Keep. I'm sorry, but have you even looked at this article? Clearly, this article is notable, NPOV, and an asset to our encyclopedia. It definitely needs expansion, but this draft is a fine start. 172.164.113.159 15:42, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

This IP's only contributions are to this AfD and, an inquiry into what is currently in his/her lower intestinal orifice. ... discospinster _talk 21:03, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

• Comment: OK, so what did you find out, then? 71.122.250.178 21:51, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete spam, not notable --AlexDW 17:12, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Danny Lilithborne ... discospinster _talk 21:03, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, per nom. *~Daniel~* 21:32, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.