Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pink Five

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep Richardcavell 04:41, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Pink Five

• delete nn-fanfilm-cruft, doesn't meet WP:WEB— Milkandwookiees ^(T | C) 16:10, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Keep Per Google Test[1]. Meets WP:WEB. Possible bad faith nom. Yanksox 16:16, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Keep as per above. Milkandwookiees seems to be suddenly nominating an awful lot of articles for deletion on very flimsy reasoning. wikipediatrix 16:25, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
• Comment We may be dealing with this. Yanksox 16:26, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Keep - and agree with Yanksox on WP:POINT. TheRealFennShysa 16:30, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Keep definatly notable, very funny too Ydam 16:39, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy keep - any fanfilm which gets the sort of award it has is definitely notable Tyhopho 17:41, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - As much as it pains me how much fancruft there is on WP, this is not part of the problem. Wickethewok 19:28, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. If Lucasfilm, the creators of the sextology, gave this film an award, it passes the notability test. — WCityMike (talk • contribs) 19:58, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Meets WP:WEB. If it really played at Cannes, it's notable. If it won the "George" (Lucasfilm award), it's acknowledged as notable by the creators of the sextology. If this article goes, it's time to nominate any movie which didn't win any awards, even if it made millions of dollars. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 20:43, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

• Just for the record, if anyone else brings up the Cannes connection - it quite definitely played there... references here, here, and a listing from Variety here. TheRealFennShysa 20:50, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

• Keep. I mean, we have porn "actor" articles, right? -- Consumed Crustacean | Talk | 21:36, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, notable and award-winning. -LtNOWIS 02:42, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - per everyone else. Why was this even listed? DillPickle 21:49, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Widely known fan film series. Vadder 18:49, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.