Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phpns

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 12:26, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Phpns

Phpns (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Anon objected to PROD; I'm proposing because it fails WP:SOFTWARE Josh Parris 04:28, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. Less than 300 nonwiki ghits, so it's not notable. YechielMan 05:52, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - fails WP:SOFTWARE. MER-C 11:02, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
• DeleteAgree its not notable and definetly fails WP:SOFTWARECometstyles ^talk
• Delete Not notable. WP:COI is indisputable from the article's edit history and original author's contributions, so if any sources to show notability were available I'm sure they'd have surfaced by now. If I was in any doubt, the first prod was anon-removed with the comment "The software package will be available very soon, by January 10th. It should not be deleted." I rest my case. CiaranG 22:58, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete It fails to meet notability criteria, and it's not presented in an encyclopedic manner, reading more like an advertisement. This is probably due to how little can be said about a non-notable program. Leebo⁸⁶ 02:59, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.