Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PhoenixFeathers

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. jni 08:25, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)

[edit] PhoenixFeathers

A discussion group. Probably a Good Thing -- but not notable. -- Hoary 08:19, 2005 Feb 14 (UTC)

• Not notable at all, there are plenty of those. Delete. Radiant! 08:27, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Unfortunately, this article is a victim of bad timing -- the brainchild of this organization is a zine called Hedgehog, which I was going to add an entry for, but the database maitenance went online at that moment. At least wait for the other article before making a decision. Besides, who says everything in an enyclopedia has to be interesting? Try hitting random page a few times; see what comes up. EDIT: The article for Hedgehog is now available. It's very rough, as I did this at 1 AM local, but I intend to improve on it later. Tsuyoshikentsu 09:13, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  • Bad timing happens. But I've read your Hedgehog article and it doesn't establish any notability beyond the average high school newspaper. Interesting is POV - notability less so. Radiant! 12:19, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, even though this was probably written in good-will, it's not notable enough. Maybe in the future? --Sn0wflake 18:34, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Non-notable. I was trying to VfD this article last night when the database got locked. RickK 20:41, Feb 14, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, local announcement. Wyss 20:57, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Not notable. JoaoRicardo 03:18, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.