Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pete Best Syndrome

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. I probably would have no consensus-ed it, but the lack of references at the time I closed this makes B.Wind's comment count as a delete, bringing it over the threshold. --Titoxd^{(?!? - help us)} 07:24, 24 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Pete Best Syndrome

31 hits. Neologism. Delete. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 23:53, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete - DavidWBrooks 01:25, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
• This term has been bandied about in music circles the last few years. Wait for references; if there is no independent reference (Internet or print) by the end of AfD, then delete. B.Wind 04:12, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and expand. Does need some references. --Thephotoman 07:04, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
• Merge Doesn't seem to be in popular usage, and the page is sparse. Would be better as a paragraph in the Pete Best article (with a redirect) or just plain deleted, imho. --kingboyk 17:00, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete It's easy to find references that disagree with the article[1], but hard to find ones that support it.
• Keep or possibly Merge with Pete Best article. Jcuk 20:47, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - feel free to recreate if independent references can be found. JesseW, the juggling janitor 21:40, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
• weak keep. I've heard this term quite a lot (ISTR first hearing it referring to Mick Abrahams on a documentary about Jethro Tull, of all people, in about 1990). Grutness...wha? 05:58, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - per WP:V unless someone comes up with a source. -GTBacchus^(talk) 07:09, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.