Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Personal branding
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Keep. --JoanneB 10:44, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Personal branding
Article reads like a sales pitch, totally unencyclopedic and non-contextual, half of the article consists of vanity editing, while the subject of the article seems legit, judging from a Google search, there's no way of understanding what the article really is about at its current state, and having it around certainly doesn't improve things. It might qualify as a neologism too, I'm bringing it here because I'm uncertain. -Obli (Talk)? 23:06, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
- Strong keep If I hadn't sold my Intro to Public Relations textbook, I'd bring it up. Branding is a huge concept in public relations and marketing, and personal branding is an extension of that. This said, article needs a major rewrite ⇒ SWATJester
Ready Aim Fire! 00:21, 7 April 2006 (UTC) - Keep per Swat. Real concept, poor article. Rewrite per DP, don't delete. Thatcher131 01:17, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
- Keep, is an actual marketing term per Mr. Swat; googles in the hundreds of thousands. Mr. Obli's concerns are completely valid however; the article as written is a spam magnet and littered with tool-speak. Improve by editing; but don't delete in entirety. Kuru talk 01:43, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
- Keep well known, deserves article. Cleanup. KillerChihuahua?!? 10:31, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
