Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Perry DeAngelis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Majorly 16:29, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Perry DeAngelis

ATTENTION! If you came here because somebody asked you to, or you read a message on a forum, please note that this is not a majority vote, but rather a discussion to establish a consensus amongst Wikipedia editors on whether a page or group of pages is suitable for this encyclopedia. We have policies and guidelines to help us decide this, and deletion decisions are made on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes. You can participate and give your opinion. Please sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Happy editing! Note: Comments made by suspected single purpose accounts can be tagged using {{subst:spa|username|UTC timestamp [optional]}}

Perry DeAngelis (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

The article was created by a fan of the Skeptics Guide to the Universe Podcast [1]. DeAngelis is not notable enough for Wikipedia.

• Delete - fails WP:BIO. Wait until he/she/they find out this "article" is up for deletion... MER-C 09:14, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
• Redirect to The Skeptics' Guide to the Universe (and de-wikilink the "Rogues"). Since Randi's involved with that weekly, it ought to be verifiable enough to stick around. Serpent's Choice 09:20, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete I'm skeptical this person is notable. Akihabara 12:29, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
• Comment there should be no doubt concerning the deletion of this article as is, a blank space under a REFERENCES header is slightly below what we expect here ... I'll keep my vote to see if there is anything added there by end of this AfD to make an informed judgment. Alf photoman 16:45, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
• Strong Keep It seems pretty obvious to me that the founder and Exectutive Director of an organization that wikipedia finds notable would be notable himself. I see no valid reason to delete this article and several compelling reasons to keep it. --Lee Vonce 17:44, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
  • I know that the Rebbecca Watson (started SkepChick) article was deleted so I do not agree with you. --Timothy Clemans 20:12, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
• Keep - Founder and Executive directory of a notable organization, and host of a notable podcast. --Falcorian ^(talk) 20:06, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Articel contains nothing encyclopedic MiracleMat 08:01, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
• Redirect to New England Skeptical Society. Not really notable enough oh his own. --Havermayer 03:41, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.