Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Perfect Kirby (second nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sango123 18:42, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Perfect Kirby

Previously deleted by Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Perfect Kirby, but this is not a repost, it is a much larger unsourced article about a Flash animation of no objectively provable significance. Not much evidence of reliable sources in any of the 150 unique Googles. Fails to rise to the exalted level of having its own domain name. Guy 14:09, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

• Delete for reasons cited in last AFD, non-notable, WP:OR,WP:V,WP:NFT. Apart from that, it is fine. Yomangani^talk 14:56, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 20:17, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
• Comment: appears to to be an unnotable fanime (and you'll observe that the article for the very term has been deleted...so good luck).--Mike18xx 04:30, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
• Comment: If this article should be deleted, why shouldn't articles like Rise of the Mushroom Kingdom be deleted? It's an article about another Flash cartoon. As for people saying that it's "unverifiable": Watch the episodes (link in the article), watch the episodes with comments turned on, look at their Newgrounds pages (link in the article) and look at their website (link in the article). If you do that, you can verify pretty much everything that has been written in the article. --81.94.65.69 05:39, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete whether we judge this by web standards (per WP:WEB) or as a "film" (no IMDB entry, among other things), it would fail either way. Frankly, I'm absolutely baffled how somebody could have taken the time to write this up, which must have taken a few hours at least, but not bothered to take a few minutes to glance through our article guidelines first. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 10:17, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Keep: As far as Flash animation series go, Perfect Kirby is extremely noteable. Its later episodes are generally recognized as being some of the finest examples of tween-style Flash animation on the internet. The criteria for webcomics seems to be a lot lower than Flash series, and I don't quite see how this is fair. I mean just compare Category:Flash cartoons to Category:Webcomics. Either webcomics need to get a lot deleted or Flash articles need to be given some slack. I perfer the latter. --SeizureDog 23:58, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment I'll go through the webcomics category looking for articles to delete, within the next few days. --Xyzzyplugh 13:44, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom and other comments. This misses WP:WEB and WP:FILM and just about any other notability guideline out there. We should only keep flash cartoons which have gotten non-trivial press coverage. Secondly, the "Hey, look at these other crappy articles, if they get to stay, this one should too!" is not a valid reason for keeping. --Kunzite 19:06, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom and above. -- Ned Scott 01:24, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.