Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Zaccone

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. -- ( drini's page ☎ ) 06:24, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Johnathan Hurrell, James McDonough, William Petrie, Paul Zaccone, Stephen Van den Eynde, Felix Vandebroek, Edward Popish, Marisi Palepale, Harold Meyer, Albert Miechielsen, Paul McLeod, Bertram Lock, Joseph Hendriks, Clarence Guerreiro, Thomas Choo, Lawrence Mampaey, Athanasius Bous, Andrew LaRiviere, Matthew Alencastre, Albert Leunens, Christopher Keahi, Clyde Guerreiro, James Anguay, Gaston Diels, Nobincio Fernandez, Albert Garcia, Clement Geysen, Herman Gomes, Father Edward Martin, Rev. Francis Schellemans

Delete All stub articles on non-notable ordinary priests containing the text "name is a Roman Catholic priest of the Hawaiian Province of the Congregation of the Sacred Hearts of Jesus and Mary." and stub notices and categories. Rmhermen 20:03, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

• Merge into something like Hawaiian Province of the Congregation of the Sacred Hearts of Jesus and Mary. I don't see any need to leave redirects. Dlyons493 Talk 20:51, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Even if there was an article on that "Hawaiian Province ...", it wouldn't make sense to list those names there. Lukas ^(T.|@) 21:07, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
• Johnathan Hurrell? Delete. James McDonough? Delete. William Petrie? Delete. Paul Zaccone? Delete. Stephen Van den Eynde? Delete. Felix Vandebroek? Delete. Edward Popish? Delete. Marisi Palepale? Delete. Harold Meyer? Delete. Albert Miechielsen? Delete. Paul McLeod? Delete. Bertram Lock? Delete. Joseph Hendriks? Delete. Clarence Guerreiro? Delete. Thomas Choo? Delete. Lawrence Mampaey? Delete. Athanasius Bous? Delete. Andrew LaRiviere? Delete. Matthew Alencastre? Delete. Albert Leunens? Delete. Christopher Keahi? Delete. Clyde Guerreiro? Delete. James Anguay? Delete. Gaston Diels? Delete. Nobincio Fernandez? Delete. Albert Garcia? Delete. Clement Geysen? Delete. Herman Gomes? Delete. Father Edward Martin? Delete. Rev. Francis Schellemans? Delete. I don't want to sound anti-Catholic or a newbie biter, but these kind of vanity articles shall be the death of Wikipedia. --D-Day 21:29, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

Merge all into Congregation of the Sacred Hearts of Jesus and Mary or delete. SYCTHOS^talk 21:33, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

• Wot sycthos said. Just zis  Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] AfD? 22:28, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
• delete Non notable. I'm sorry if this phrase sounds harsh to the subject or the author. I have not searched myself to prove they are all not notable - but the articles, as they are make, no assetion of notability. If one of these people is also a published author or is often quoted in the paper, that article can be recreated with that information.Obina 23:08, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete without merge. Non-notable in this format; would still be non-notable as a list of same. I only viewed a few of the above pages, assuming good faith on the part of nominator that they all adhere to the same one-sentence stub format. -Ikkyu2 23:51, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete all as non-notable. --Cyde Weys 01:16, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, do not merge. User:Zoe|^(talk) 01:28, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete all Not important enough. CalJW 04:02, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. I am sure these are good men of the cloth, they just are not notable. Furthermore, a merge would be unneccesary to boot. Youngamerican 04:37, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete all unless some assertion of importance/significance/notability shows up, at which point I might reconsider. Maybe. -- Thesquire (talk - contribs) 07:33, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete all per Youngamerican. Stifle 16:45, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.