Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul W. Dillon Home

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. — CharlotteWebb 19:52, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Paul W. Dillon Home

Does not look notablile. Also can we answear the general question of, is everything that is on the national registry notable? Depending on the response to the last question should deciede if this is a keep or a delete. —— Eagle (ask me for help) 02:10, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

Perhaps, perhaps not

Maybe, maybe not, depends on your perspective I guess. Dillon figures prominently in the history of Sterling, Illinois. I don't know thoughA mcmurray 05:34, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

• This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 11:50, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

• Keep. Since the home is operated as a museum and is open to the public, it is of more interest to readers than if it weren't. I added Category:Museums in Illinois to the article. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 12:58, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
• Weak keep out of public interest. Arbusto 23:20, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
• Keep on account that it's on the National Register of Historic Places. --Dennisthe2 19:09, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.