Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Kelly (ecologist)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. moink 23:56, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Paul Kelly (ecologist)

I believe this to be a non-notable bio, although the article does attempt to assert some notability. I've had some discussions on the talk page with the article's creator regarding sources, but those that were provided (such as the "very exasperated person in the White House who reads his letters then hands them to the president") don't really fit the criteria at WP:V. Joyous | Talk 03:29, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. Non-notable, no sources cited, and a few other problems. Royboycrashfan 03:32, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. The discourse on the talk page was good for a brief chuckle. And I do mean very brief. --Kinu 03:37, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Avi 04:31, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete this may be genuine attempt but failure to answer questions or show valid notability as previously posed on discussion page and thus inability to verify, leads to my current vote.VirtualSteve 05:28, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Again.

• 03:04, January 31, 2006 Golbez deleted "Paul Kelly (ecologist)" (either vanity or nn; no links, no notability attempted, and a quarter of the article is an attack on yours truly)
• 00:24, December 12, 2005 Eugene van der Pijll deleted "Paul Kelly (ecologist)" (content was: '{db|nonsense / not-notable}Paul Kelly is a ecologist. He is currently writing a story called "Quarantine Zone" and is in the process of publishing ...')
• 02:47, May 18, 2005 Golbez deleted "Paul Kelly (ecologist)" (vanity)

Creator has no history outside this article, except for one piece of trivial vandalism. Just zis  Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] 13:25, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete this is just recreation of a previously deleted article. Elfguy 13:49, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Looks self written. Krashlandon (e) 17:17, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per nom, possible vanity. Dustimagic *\o/* ^{(talk/contribs)} *\o/* 22:11, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom and per verifiability policy mentioned under every edit box. Can be re-created at any time if proper source citations, as described in WP:V and WP:CITE are provided that correspond to the key facts mentioned in the article. Dpbsmith (talk) 01:32, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as per nom --KimvdLinde 22:44, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.