Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Holt

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was No consensus. Deathphoenix 17:08, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Paul Holt

Delete Non-notable, and has never been notable. Does not conform to any of the requirements on WP:MUSIC as far as I can see. TomPhil 19:08, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

• Keep If only to tweak Simon --Ruby 21:30, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment Actually he proved Simon right. TomPhil 23:41, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per TomPhil. Stifle 22:32, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

• Weak keep as he has attained notable status through his singing career. Bobby1011 13:49, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. The article mentions only an appearance on a TV show and a single song that entered the charts at number 35. That doesn't make him notable in my book. --Thunk 20:56, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
• Very Weak Keep as per Bobby1011 Jporcaro 21:24, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete or merge It's very much a 15 minutes of fame thing - nobody knows anything about him aside from what was on television, nor does anyone seem to care. If it really is "notable" it would be better served by going in as a short footnote in the Simon Cowell article. MSJapan 21:26, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. If someone wants to add this to the Simon Cowell article, that would probably be OK. dbtfz^talk 01:50, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Barely notable, but certainly no importance. -- Krash (Talk) 15:03, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.