Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pamela Gemin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was KEEP. Robert ^{T | @ | C} 04:16, 14 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Pamela Gemin

"Found while cleaning out speedies, very narrow in content, but Google verifies the existence of the article's subject. No vote. Titoxd^(?!?) 05:17, 8 November 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. - CHAIRBOY (☎) 05:22, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. --VileRage (Talk|Cont) 05:56, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
• Weak keep published author of multiple books; mention of books or author in a number of academic web sites; listed on Amazon, etc.

jnothman ^talk 07:01, 8 November 2005 (UTC)

• Keep, published author, not vanity. fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 07:32, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep as per WP:BIO, poet with multiple books to her credit albeit as editor. Capitalistroadster 09:01, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep as a legitimate stub. Anville 10:13, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
• Weak delete Per published authors, editors, and photographers who have written books with an audience of 5,000 or more or in periodicals with a circulation of 5,000 or more, I highly doubt that she has approaches this figure. Dottore So 10:32, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
• Weak delete per User:Dottoreso. — JIP | Talk 13:37, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
• Weak keep just about makes it. Just zis Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] :: AfD? 13:47, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Known author/editor. Unfair to judge poets' notability by sales alone. Perodicticus 13:53, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Known author/editor. -- 09:27, 8 November 2005 (EST)
• Keep since she is a known author with several books to her name. Yamaguchi先生 08:59, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep Article should be kept, author has a few books to her name, Fertray, 9 November 2005

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.