Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pamela Gemin (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 01:20, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Pamela Gemin

Pamela Gemin (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This is a procedural nomination on behalf of User:71.210.212.187, who stated that Gemin has asked him/her to delete it for personal reasons. The article survived a previous AfD. Spacepotato 09:47, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

• Delete This article does not, I feel, satisfy WP:PROF. But in any case, if the subject of the article has requested its deletion, I feel that we should respect her wishes. There is clearly no issue of public safety or public awareness which demands its retention.--Anthony.bradbury 13:11, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
• Comment in view of the heated debate re. Daniel Brandt I feel that we should remain consequent for at least a week. So reasons for deletion are failing WP:A WP:N and/or WP:V. If the nominator could show us where this article fails any of the above I'll happily go along, if not I'll have to go for a Speedy Keep Alf^Photoman 15:19, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletions. -- Pete.Hurd 16:46, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
• Keep. Once a writer is interviewed by a major regional newspaper and by national radio, they become a public figure. I added some references. Besides, there doesn't seem to be anything derogatory in the article. --Eastmain 18:52, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
• Keep. Aside from possible issues of being a public figure, there is no actual proof that Ms. Gemin has asked the article to be removed, but only a claim from a user. -- Black Falcon 21:00, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete She is not enough of a public figure for us to keep the article against her wishes, per BLP. DGG 04:17, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
• Keep per Black Falcon, and that it seems to pass WP:ATT.—Carolfrog 05:13, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
• Keep, passes WP:ATT, WP:BIO. That aside, I take "the subject asked for this to be deleted" with a heavy dose of salt. Who says, with what proof? RGTraynor 20:26, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.