Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PWI 500

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the nomination was delete. Mangojuice^talk 16:50, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] PWI 500

A large list of 15 years worth of 500 wrestlers per year. We don't even have an article like this on the Maxim Hot 100 which I would argue is much more notable than this. Metros232 14:03, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

• Merge into Pro Wrestling Illustrated as a summary and perhaps a list of the #1 each year. Definitely don't keep the big lists. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 14:13, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment: it's already been there Pro_Wrestling_Illustrated#PWI_500 Metros232 14:15, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
• In that case then, Delete as redundant. --Arnzy ^{(whats up?)} 14:31, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as poposal. michaelCurtis ^talk+_{contributions} 23:32, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Thanks; I was considering nomming the list myself. Besides the gigantic-ness, the copyright status of such a list is debatable - the decision on whether to include any given wrestler is arbitrarily made by Pro Wrestling Illustrated, as is the order, so it's considered an original creation of PWI. Zetawoof^(ζ) 01:05, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Over the top and a breach of copyright. Cloachland 02:39, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
• No opinion. I am just notifying you that I have reduced the list to only the top 10 wrestlers for each year. Maybe this will keep the page going.--Desmond Hobson 07:28, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.