Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ovo-lacto vegetarianism

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. --Tony Sidaway^Talk 11:10, 28 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Ovo-lacto vegetarianism

• Merge are re-direct into vegetarianism. Content already covered in other articles. Article is only a definition that should be moved to wiktionary and has no hopes of ever being more than a sub-section of vegetarianism. --Vizcarra 19:27, 1 August 2005 (UTC)
• Merge or delete I agree, nothing new here, no possibility of non-duplicate content with vegetarianism. IreverentReverend 19:42, 1 August 2005 (UTC)
• Strong keep - wtf are you on about? This is encyclopedic and a perfectly good stub. Dunc|☺ 18:44, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
• Strong keeep per Dunc.Jobe6 19:12, August 21, 2005 (UTC)
• Merge into vegetarianism, per Vizcarra. Acetic Acid 19:21, August 21, 2005 (UTC)
• Strong keep - invalid VfD posting. Merged articles should specifically not be deleted because the history must be maintained under the GFDL. In addition, merges do not require admin intervention. Guettarda 19:26, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect to vegetarianism--topic already covered there, and is more useful in that context. Niteowlneils 21:10, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
• keep and allow for organic growth. Kappa 21:27, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and if not, transwiki then redirect to vegetarianism. --Apyule 04:28, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
• Merge as per Vizcarra. Also, I agree with Guettarda, this needn't have been VFD. FlooK 05:07, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
• Yes, Vizcarra should note that this is votes for deletion. Could have easily been bold and just merged it himself. If article is merged (as it should be), a redirect should be left to preserve GFDL. Proto t c 09:41, 23 August 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.