Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oscar Van Nooijen (second nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 11:51, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Oscar Van Nooijen

Non-notable election candidate loser. Has survived previous AFD but two IPs have attempted to nominate this for AFD without completing the process (see talk page). Similar articles have been deleted: for e.g.. Although this is more a technical nom for me, I'm voting delete as non-notable. The JPS^{talk to me} 20:51, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

• Delete 615 ghits — ßottesiηi ^(talk) 20:56, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Non notable, and I say that as OULC 129.67.55.156 21:41, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Not notable --Starionwolf 22:16, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. DarthVader 22:38, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. OhNoitsJamie^Talk 23:22, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
• Weak keep for the reasons put forward in previous debates. Candidates for major parties are of interest to those who are interested in politics. I make this prediction - if it is deleted, at some stage there will be clear agreement that an article is needed for this man. His notability will increase. --Bduke 02:24, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as above. This page started as a vanity page, with corresponding vanity edits to the OULC page. Both having been NPOV'd, his non-notability is emphasised. Mtpt 10:08, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --82.45.210.9 22:16, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.