Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Orange Juice (website)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete-- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 15:36, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orange Juice (website)

Orange Juice (website) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notable website per WP:WEB, no sources. Contested prod. RJASE1 ^Talk 14:16, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

• Dubtfull It's not that notable, but not unknown either. // Liftarn
  • Comment So.. is that keep, or delete? What is "dubtfull"? --Vossanova ^o< 14:48, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
    • Either way. If not sources can be found it will have to go, but it is quite well known among those into demos. // Liftarn
• Weak keep. Unfortunately it seems as though the Orange Juice website is defunct now, but I feel it still has historic value as a demoscene portal. We just need some reliable sources to back that up. If the consensus of this debate leans toward delete, then I would strongly suggest to merge and redirect to Nectarine (radio) instead, since ojuice.net redirects there now and the sites share much of their content. --Vossanova ^o< 15:15, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment Oops, seems as though Nectarine (radio) is up for delete too. Damn. --Vossanova ^o< 15:16, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. WP:PN as far as I can read it. Mystache 00:12, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
• Merge to Demoscene. Simply not notable on its own. Also contains vanity cruft claims, such as claiming "it was the first demoscene-related portal on the Internet". This is simply not true since the demoscene portals existed on the Internet, even previous to the advent of the WWW, usually in the form of telnet-available BBSs. Regardless, it has some notability as a hisotrically popular demoscene portal, but not enough to comprise its own articles by WP standards. Vassyana 08:10, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
• Merge per Vassyana. The website was important for the demoscene, but isn't notable enough to have its own article. -- Chairman S. Talk ^Contribs 06:02, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.