Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Or Not Dark Energy?

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete as original research. No need to prolong this. P.S. Dark energy remains hypotehtical (sorry, just had to add that!). El_C 11:36, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Or Not Dark Energy?

Original research / essay, prod removed by author without comment. Marasmusine 17:52, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Why do you want to remove this? This is something original written by me, and I ask you please to keep it! Thank you, Tom Weil

Hi Tom, I'd like to remove it because it is 'original research'. Please see WP:NOT#Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought. Marasmusine 17:58, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

I am a scientist, and this article is my understanding of the observable facts of the universe! I am not the only scientist who has this understanding of the expansion of the universe, so PLEASE keep it!!! Tom Weil

• Delete An encyclopedia is not the place for this. See WP:NOR. –Joke 18:12, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

You are CRAZY to delete this!! This is Real Science!! Dark Energy may not turn out to be Real Science!! Tom Weil [email removed]

I suggest, then, that you write a paper on it and submit it to a scientific journal. –Joke 18:28, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Would you be willing to include it if I make a $100. contribution to Wikipedia? Tom Weil

• Delete. Which of the words "no original research" don't you understand? We will take your $100 and still delete the article! -- RHaworth 19:36, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per violation of WP:NOR. Michael Kinyon 13:24, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

• This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 15:30, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. Are you kidding me? Bribing Wikipedia in order to get original research posted? Go submit it to a scientific journal if you want, but keep it out of here. --Wafulz 15:55, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, textbook original research. Suggest author get a blog.--Isotope23 17:24, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete and hahaha at RHaworth! Danny Lilithborne 17:59, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.