Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Opinionated Voice

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mindmatrix 00:56, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Opinionated Voice

Tagged as a speedy with the justification "just describing a personal blog has no encyclopedic value". WhiteNight ^{T | @ | C} 01:31, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete as non-notable website (Alexa rank of 1,983,048). —Quarl ^(talk) 2005-12-31 02:33Z
• Delete no blog started in August 2005 isd likely to have achieved notability by now, and this one is no exception. In fact, it looks a lot like vanispamcruftvertisement. Just zis  Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] AfD? 16:53, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep This is of notable encylopedic value. This blog should be considered of value, even if just to provide an alternate opinion, perspective and information to the blogs listed here that are islamophobic/anti-Islam and the articles that equate Muslims and those that value the Shariah as Islamists. Jamalx 18:16, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

  Jamalx (talk • contribs) has only contributed to the page(s) under discussion for deletion and AFD —Quarl ^(talk) 2005-12-31 22:03Z

• Delete - It might serve a useful purpose, but WP is WP:NOT a webdirectory. - CHAIRBOY (☎) 00:09, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - Non-notable. -- Super Sam 11:08, 5 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.