Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Operations management

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. This has already been done due to copyvio.

• 16:58, 11 Mar 2005 Quadell deleted Operations management (Listed on WP:CP since March 3.)

Deathphoenix 01:23, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Operations management

I originally put this on pages needing attention, but there seems to be a precedent for deleting research requests - which is what this page currently is. JeremyA 05:55, 2 Mar 2005 (UTC)

• Weak keep. We certainly need an article on opman, but the current article is not it. -- Brhaspati (talk, contribs) 06:19, 2005 Mar 2 (UTC)
• It's a request for informtation, userfy, or delete--nixie 06:47, 2 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Article is almost devoit of encyclopedic content. Topic itself is valid, but I see no value in keeping the current revision in the page history when this gets rewritten. jni 09:38, 2 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Keep Important topic. Needs attention not deletion. — RJH 18:15, 2 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• This should stay a requested article. The current content contributes nothing the creation of that article. It is as others have said a research request. We would be better off with a redlink. Rossami (talk) 00:29, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Seems to be marginally more useful than a redlink. However, it's a copyvio. —Korath (Talk) 09:37, Mar 3, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. And post topic in Wikipedia:Requested articles. Dpbsmith (talk) 01:55, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete I agree with the notion of "valid topic - delete article content". I'd not consider using copyvio material on a page and placing an attention tag on it as a very good way to encourage article expansion .. but the good intentions were surely there. Courtland 02:25, 2005 Mar 7 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.