Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olpere

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Sango123 21:08, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Olpere

I deleted this article because it seemed an OR to me, at least the naming part. The author contacted me and stated notability reasons: 1. Used constantly, just not NAMED 2. Somebody has to do it 3. Industrial context 4. Keep reading trade magazines 5. Respect the license and monitor patents issued

So I am putting it here to generate a clearer consensus. The naming part is problematic, the rest seems quite ok. So I suggest move somewhere. --Tone 12:29, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

• Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day while working for an Electronic Load manufacturer! As I'm not a scientist, I don't know how sound the science behind it is - but the article is written by the person who coined the term. Two days ago. There is absolutely no assertion of the term's notability within its field - just one citation of a noted scientific publication would be enough, I think. If such a thing can't be found, verifiability can't be established, so it has to be a delete. Otherwise, I could just create an article calling the exact same thing a "Spledgekoff", and who could say which of us was right and which one wrong? Seb Patrick 12:36, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Seb Partrick. (I am a scientist.) — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 13:13, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
• Strong delete per nom. Xyrael ^T 16:14, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Delete A term coined 29 May 2006 by an Electrical Engineer is an example of absolute non-notability. CP/M 23:05, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.