Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oksana d'Harcourt
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Nearly Headless Nick {C} 13:50, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Oksana d'Harcourt
Possible vanity page about a non-notible pornography actress. Keep .... or no Keep? (a funny take on a DOND phrase) BuickCenturyDriver 06:11, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- Comment - The filmography listed in the article indicates a film using her name in the title. If this film is not a compilation and it's verifiable then she passes WP:PORNBIO and should be kept. If it's a compilation or if it's unverifiable then she doesn't and the article should be deleted. Otto4711 06:33, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete No reliable independent references. I don't see how having her name on a porn film makes her in any way more notable than if some other title were on the film, whatever the creators of WP:PORNBIO may have written into their proposed guideline. Inkpaduta 18:59, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- Comment: French interwiki page exists for almost year. Pavel Vozenilek 23:35, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete as nn. --MaNeMeBasat 15:05, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep: Non-notible (sic)? If she's in the French wikipédia, then maybe she's known by more people than only myself. Anyway, keep or delete, someone else will probably repeat the entry soon. Her being a porn actress first doesn't make her any less worthy and respectable: wiki's for those who want to know... AnPrionsaBeag 21:11, 13 February 2007 (UTC) AnPrionsaBeag
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
