Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Obsessive Demand
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Speedily deleted by Vamp:Willow. (aeropagitica) (talk) 12:05, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Obsessive Demand
I believe that this is either copy pasted and copyvio, or original research. Perhaps whomever summarily removed my prod would like to defend this wall of text? Appropriate Username 02:13, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
- Strong delete as original research. The page says the article is by Ajit Kumar Pandey, who seems to be a student (see his page at [1]) -- Hirudo 03:01, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Clearly OR (the guy signed it, for Pete's sake), and the history shows he Moved it from his user page. Reads like some fairly basic principles of microeconomics, poorly translated from another language. Most of it sounds like stuff I've read before, with very odd word choices. What he calls "obsessive demand" seems a lot like consumer preference. Fan1967 02:52, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete WP:NOT original research, WP:NOT indiscriminate collection of information. This is just a proposed study. Tony Bruguier 03:39, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - it's an essay. Full marks to him for writing it, but he should subject it to peer review and publish it in a journal, not here. - Richardcavell 05:37, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete This looks like a text-dump of a student research proposal, no original research refers. (aeropagitica) (talk) 06:10, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, seems like OR. Dspserpico 06:36, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
I've taken it out on a speedy basis as clearly original research (signed!) etc. --Vamp:Willow 11:02, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
