Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nutty P
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was keep (no consensus). Sjakkalle (Check!) 06:23, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Nutty P
Appears to fail WP:MUSIC despite claims in the article. Searching for the album title gives two (exactly!) hits [1], and the artist doesn't appear at AllMusic.com or amazon.co.uk. Mikeblas 15:14, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Google News gives one hit, which is a story about someone else. In my books, that adds up to Delete - and how! WilyD 15:57, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as non-notable. --Ed (Edgar181) 16:06, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
- Keep: Notable for the following reasons:
- Has been featured in multiple non-trivial published works in reliable and reputable media (excludes things like school newspapers, personal blogs, etc...).
- Has been placed in rotation nationally by any major radio network.
- Has credit for writing or co-writing either lyrics or music for a musician or ensemble that qualifies above.
- Is frequently covered in publications devoted to a notable sub-culture. Yeanold Viskersenn 18:23, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
- The article doesn't document these claims. It enumerates some collaborations, but doesn't discuss their work product or describe them in any way. -- Mikeblas 20:20, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
- Strong Keep - Article's creator seems to be rather the music afficionado (See his contributions), and does seem to meet a fair few points on WP:MUSIC - and let's not forget that Google is not the be all, end all! I'll throw my support behind him, seeing as it doesn't seem to be a vanity page. HawkerTyphoon 20:03, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. Notable enough. Interviewed on BBC News Online[2], and plenty of other good google hits. Stu ’Bout ye! 10:52, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
