Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nululu Online

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. -Splash^talk 19:03, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Nululu Online

Non-notable MMORPG (an acronym the article doesn't even get right). Daniel Case 06:11, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as per nom Maustrauser 06:16, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Criticizing a mistake in the article is unfair considering that it was tagged after one minute and was obviously done by a non-native English speaker. Furthermore, how do we know this is not an important Thai-language MMORPG in the Thai market? Seems fairly unique to me, but perhaps the nom would care to provide some analysis. -- JJay 06:22, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

How about an Alexa rank of ... 1,799,518? I apologize for any offense I might have given, but frankly I don't see the point of keeping this unless we want all the other several thousand MMORPGs with higher Alexa ratings we've deleted in the last several months. If it's an important Thai MMORPG, let them do an article in the Thai Wikipedia first (assuming they haven't already). Daniel Case 06:28, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

• I don't know how many Thai articles we have deleted, but I tend to doubt it's in the thousands. As I don't read Thai, I have not verified whether the Thai wikipedia has an article (I assume you have). However, does the Alexa rank matter if the game is played over mobile phones? What kind of participation are we looking for with these games in the Thai context? The press reports suggest 3,000 users in the beta. I beleve we need some valid input from Thai users here. -- JJay 06:42, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

I was referring to MMPORPGs in general, not Thai ones. All I'm saying is, keep this one and you open the door to an ungodly number of MMPORPGs, in every language. Yes, we do need input from Thai users, but I'm doubtful that even if we do get it it will result in a good reason for keeping it. Daniel Case 14:38, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

I don't feel that keeping or deleting an article opens or closes the door to anything. Therefore I see no compelling reason to delete this. -- JJay 02:30, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as per Daniel Case Aussie Alchemist 02:26, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per alexa rank and nothing even hinting at significance. Sounds like development is barely underway with this. If it becomes popular and starts getting discussed by third-party sources, maybe it could have an article then, but as it is, there's nothing verifiable here. Friday (talk) 15:24, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Friday. Stifle 00:04, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.