Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nuklear Age

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Mailer Diablo 17:13, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Nuklear Age

Nonnotable self-published comic book; 88 unique Ghits, Amazon sales rank below 300,000. NawlinWiki 20:44, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

• Comment. Not a comic book. Novel (prose). --maru (talk) contribs 21:11, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

• Very weak keep. The article's been around for a while and seems to have had multiple contributors. Even though the book currently has a relatively low sales rank and comes from a vanity press, it has a relatively large number of (borderline non-trivial) reviews on Amazon, and its author has an as-yet-unchallenged Wikipedia article. I think a lot of the content (all those character bios and extended plot "summary") is unencyclopedic, however, and would be in favor of deleting most if not all of the character articles such as Katkat, Nihel and Mighty Metallic Magno Man. If they aren't included in this AfD, I'll eventually list them separately. -David Schaich ^Talk/_Contrib 23:08, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

• Keep, though I agree with the comments above that the article can be trimmed down substantially and that the various "character" articles can be removed. --Chrismith 05:00, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

• Keep. Definitely trim the separate pages for character bios though. None of them are necessary or cover information that is not already found in the main article. As for the Amazon Sales Rank, that's not a very accurate ruler to go by. The book seems to rubberband between 50k - 300k depending on the day of the week. Kurosen 06:52, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

• Weak Keep. --maru (talk) contribs 04:27, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.