Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nucular Power

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete – Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 09:52, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Nucular Power

(Probable) neologism, inheritely POV and unencyclopedic. Probably counts as original research. —Felix the Cassowary (ɑe hɪː jɐ) 01:18, 8 October 2005 (UTC)

• Delete per nom —Felix the Cassowary (ɑe hɪː jɐ) 01:18, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete POV attack —Wahoofive (talk) 01:30, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per nom --Rogerd 02:35, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per nom, well said. --W.marsh 02:37, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect to Nuclear power. Pburka 03:03, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
  • Alternatively, redirect to Nucular. Pburka 18:17, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Do not redirect, it's not a common typo. -Splash^talk 03:34, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
  • Splash, I don't understand. Even if its never used, whats the harm in the redirect? Furthermore, to me, it seems a likely misspelling. --best, kevin ···Kzollman | Talk··· 05:03, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
    • It's a common mispronunciation, not a common misspelling —Wahoofive (talk) 23:24, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
• #REDIRECT → Nuclear Power, {{R from misspelling}} --Mysidia (talk) 07:02, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
• Cute attack and all but make #REDIRECT as per Mysidia. Qaz ^(talk) 07:32, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect to Nuclear power. feydey 15:59, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. We can't make every possible misspelling of every word a redirect. -R. fiend 17:30, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete without redirect. I agree with nom; inherently POV. Btm 20:19, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Despite giving me a chuckle, it's not something for an encyclopedia. Bushytails 06:02, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
• Create redirect to Nuclear power. That misspelling is actually somewhat common. --Jacquelyn Marie 22:46, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
• Actually no, not so much a misspelling as a satirical one, like lurve or yoof. So a redirect would be a bad idea. But anyway that's all been dealt with already at Nucular. So delete. Flapdragon 01:37, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
  • I don't know... I go to college and copyedit a lot of papers. That one actually gets thrown around seriously. --Jacquelyn Marie 13:48, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect to Nuclear power. Redirects are cheap. Jkelly 01:06, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
• BJAODN and redirect to nuclear power. Nice POV satire regarding the inability of a lot of people to pronounce "nuclear" as noo-clur rather than noo-clear. Roodog2k (Hello there!) 15:32, 12 October 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.