Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Novemthree Siahaan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Luna Santin 03:53, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Novemthree Siahaan

This article has been tagged for deletion for some time, but no discussion page was then created. As it is not a clear-cut case, I am carrying it here for discussion. (Liberatore, 2006). 15:24, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. Seems to be one of those "Hey, come look at the circus freak!" articles. In addition, there's been a cleanup tag on the article for almost six months, and nothing's been done about it; that sort of puts a nail in the "this article is important!" argument. --Aaron 16:00, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Important, notable freak, just like Gianna Jessen and Brian Peppers and Lobster Boy and Joseph Merrick. Billy Blythe 18:50, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Reluctant, but I can't see that it fails notability.--Runcorn 21:09, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
• Mergeto Gigantiform cementoma. It's a tumour which took over the kid's face, and happens from time to time (ie the condition has a name). If he had a book or film created after him à la Elephant Man, he would indeed be notable. Ohconfucius 11:30, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Cleanup is needed, but the subject is notable.--Poetlister 16:57, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Notable because he is a notable person inflicted with Gigantiform cementoma. Xamian 01:25, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.