Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/North Canyon High School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Mailer Diablo 10:44, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] North Canyon High School

It is pretty much just a breeding ground for vandalism and does not establish any kind of notability. Although I am usually for school articles the name of the school's district doesn't even have a page. mboverload 01:22, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

• Comment Sorry for removing the AfD, I was making an edit vs vandalism and I guess the AfD got caught accidently :{. Anyway, just as a friendly note, most schools are considered notable by existance, so you may be in for a bit of a struggle justifying nn here. --Lakhim 01:54, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

Response ah ok =). Yes I realize that most school articles are noteable but there is really nothing in there that makes it stand out. Of course, that's what an AfD is for. If everyone could delete articles as they saw fit Wikipedia wouldn't exist! =) --mboverload 02:00, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

• Keep, high schools are notable and this article looks like good expandable (or should that be expendable? :-) ) material. Kimchi.sg 07:20, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Precedence on real and verifiable high schools are clear, and this is at least an article and not a directory type listing. (Some trouble with the neutrality however: "...features outstanding programs in academics and theater" looks a bit promotional to me.) Sjakkalle (Check!) 07:31, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per general precedent for schools. --Rob 08:06, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep and kill the advertising per Sjakkalle. Protect the page if the school persistes in using its page for advertising. JeffBurdges 10:57, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, as per convention, but tidy up. Markb 12:35, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, as per precedent for schools. Carioca 13:03, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep non-notable school, crap article, spammy as hell, but it's against some people's religion to suggest that any school is not encycloaedic. Just zis Guy you know? 13:20, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep as per JzG. All Pokémon schools are inherently notable. Metros232 13:24, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, all schools are notable, needs to be cleanup though. --Terence Ong 15:45, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep as per the above comments. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 23:26, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, schools are generally not notable unless they are the location of a significant event. Cedars 01:28, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. By precedent, schools (especially High Schools and above) are inherently notable. Apply {{cleanup}} and rewrite. ~Kylu (u|t) 03:43, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Sjakkalle. -- DS1953 ^talk 16:12, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - high schools are inherently notable. -- Jjjsixsix ^(t)/_(c) @ 04:38, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.