Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Non-roster invitee

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Titoxd^(?!?) 01:01, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Non-roster invitee

Wikipedia is not a dictionary Kramden4700 23:17, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

• Keep It's not really a dictionary term, it is a term that is used and could be expanded. I see no reason for deletion. When applying dictionary terms, it's really with verbs and such. Yanksox 23:47, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep I'd say its encyclopedic. --Pboyd04 00:31, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Worth explaining on Wikipedia. BoojiBoy 01:42, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. MLB transactions are ridiculously byzantine and complex, and articles like this one are a valuable addition. -Hit bull, win steak^(Moo!) 03:31, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - I have to say that I find this is an excellent example of a wikipedia article. - Richardcavell 04:05, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep on the roster and wikify. More than a dicdef and precisely the kind of topic a lot of people come to WP for. ~ trialsanderrors 06:27, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
• Merge into Spring training. Travel Plaza Babes 15:56, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.