Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/No Broker Fee Apartments NYC
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-11 08:43Z
[edit] No Broker Fee Apartments NYC
PROD and "needs-wikification" tags removed by creator (only contributor) with no improvement. It's a fluffy bit of OR or a personal essay or how-to of some sort on its face, completely uncited. Also trying to weasel in or support several bits of blatant spam (repeatedly speedy-deleted) from the author. DMacks 02:26, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Uncited, unverified original research.--TBCΦtalk? 03:13, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete: Completely original research and biased at that. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 03:32, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - badly written, bad title, blah blah blah. I started looking around though and we don't have any article on apartment brokers period, which I'm thinking maybe we should. Just an article telling what they are what citys you find them in, mention brokers fees, etc. It seems like a notable concept worthy of some explanation somewhere. - Arch NME 09:27, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - It does not cite sources, biased, and mostly OR. The title is also terrible. It also reads much more like an essay then a Wiki article. - Century0 13:00, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - in addition to the above comments, the article also reads in part like a how-to guide. -- Whpq 21:01, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - WP:OR, how-to guide, not encyclopedic. —SaxTeacher (talk) 23:35, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - The title makes it sound like a blatant ad, and the body reads like an essay you'd find on a timeshare sales pamphlet.--AgentCDE 01:25, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete as unsourced original research essay, and a unencyclopedic how-to guide.-- danntm T C 02:40, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
