Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nina Petrovna Valetova
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. — CharlotteWebb 04:45, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Nina Petrovna Valetova
No claims to notability Ideogram 10:51, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
- Comment: Portal:Russia/Russia-related Wikipedia notice board notified. Pavel Vozenilek 11:52, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
- Comment: she does seem to be mentioned in some independent publications. But yes, we need to deal with the artist cruf, it seems that anybody (and their dog...) who has painted something and managed to get it exhibited somewhere want to be in Wikipedia... -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk 15:44, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep, formally WP:BIO is satisfied with several non-trivial mentions and an independent exposition, which leads us to wonder whether WP:BIO is strict enough not top convert Wikipedia into an artists phone book Alf photoman 17:34, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Majorly (o rly?) 10:25, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
- Weak keep per Alf photoman. She does seem to satisfy criteria for notability - but one must question whether the article will ever expand beyond a stub. -- Chairman S. Talk Contribs 11:05, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Works written about her seem to demonstrate notability. --Oakshade 02:06, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep per Alf photoman. MalikCarr 03:10, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep per above. --MaNeMeBasat 16:41, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.