Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nikki Keddie

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-02-23 09:07Z

[edit] Nikki Keddie

Nikki Keddie (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

nnZadeez 02:33, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Oppose notable and has won several awards [1] Aminz 07:34, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

• This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 12:47, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

• Weak keep per a number of published books. Definitely needs more sources. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 16:18, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
• Weak Keep, definitely problems with WP:V Alf photoman 17:16, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep as she passes the good old proftest. This is one of those rare occasions when my area of expertise overlaps with that of the prof being tested. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 21:20, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep and cleanup as it looks like a list at the moment. Alba 16:30, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep and cleanup. The Balzan Prize is a pretty big deal, but the article is more list than text, and what text there is has been written in the third person. -Hit bull, win steak^(Moo!) 22:57, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep. The subject looks notable, the article could use some improvement but that's justification for improving, not deleting. ;) (jarbarf) 00:42, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep and cleanup.--Leroy65X 15:51, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.