Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicholas White

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy deleted g1 nonsense, g10 attack; all entries below are vandalism except the last two. NawlinWiki 19:24, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Nicholas White

Nicholas White (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

The article seems to be a speedy deletion candidate under criterion A7 in my eyes, however the CSD was contested twice. No assertation of notability/significance. Possibly an attack page as well. Kyra_~(talk) 19:10, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Speedy Keep An essential article. I would recommend that users instead work on expanding it. Miss "Chinky" White 19:11, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Keep The article clearly asserts notability by stating that Mr. White is the world's most succesful paedophile. Your newest user 19:13, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Speedy Keep Probably bad faith by user recommending it for deletion. A highly respected wikipedian 19:14, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Speedy Keep Trememndously important article. Bebo-man 19:17, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Keep Manifestly encyclopedic. Pope uuuuuhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh 19:21, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

I for one can verify that all these allegations are true. And what could be more significant than a paedophile at large who has evaded the authorities for many years--Pope Nick White 19:12, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

The above edits are by the same user.

• Speedy Delete Absolutely A7, also a slander page probably.--CastAStone|^(talk) 19:24, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete. Absolutely slander. It's clearly an attack page. Also, admins should check some of the users who voted "speedy keep" as they may be sock puppets of each other. They have a history of attacking this Nicholas White person, as seen here [1], here [2], and here [3]. If you check those pages, two of the users apparently reposted the same thing, an attack on that Nicholas White person. Shrumster 19:27, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.