Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nexopia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep and cleanup. Deathphoenix ʕ 03:19, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Nexopia

Unreferenced, largely unverifiable, often implausible, [1] shows 60-odd unique hits from under half a million, which is very low for a supposedly popular blogging system. Guy 13:15, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

I don't see where your getting that, I see 451 [2] from just Nexopia.com. Also it has been mentioned in news & papers, although it may have been bad things about them they still talk about them. --207.216.137.56 18:23, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

Sorry forgot to login, above is me. How is this largely unverifiable? It just needs some referencing. --Simonkoldyk 18:25, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

My google search gets a LOT more results. I get about 708 unique results. 68.149.19.75

With that logic you may as well delete the entry for MySpace. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 143.166.226.16 (talk • contribs). Exactly, delete this one and delete the MySpace entry at the same time. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.72.174.155 (talk • contribs).

• I'm agreeing with the anons. The Google hits are odd, but looking over google nets a few [3] [4] places that mention it has a social networking phonomenon in Canada the same way MySpace has generated attention in the US. Also, big-boards.com [5] lists its forums as having more posts than Something Awful Forums. That might be the way they do their counting but I say both these facts make it significant. Keep passes WP:WEB. —Mitaphane _talk 04:26, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
• Weak keep. I think the article could be cleaned up. It certainly seems popular enough here in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, though I am not a member. --Yamla 16:23, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

• Keep. This is definitely a popular service, at least in Western Canada. It can be easily identified by teenagers/young adults in British Columbia, at least. I do agree that it requires a cleanup. Maybe identification of demographics would help to clarify the popularity of the service. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 142.231.69.76 (talk • contribs).

Note that the above vote was cast by an editor with no prior edit history. --Yamla 17:48, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

• Delete --Peta 04:50, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Kc4 02:07, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
• Very Strong KEEP Fix it up a little 142.161.239.14

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.