Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Beginning Cult

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Sango123 (e) 23:13, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] New Beginning Cult

Probable Hoax. No relevant Ghits for the name. Sources provided do exist but no apparent mention of the article. Even if it is not a hoax, notability is an issue. Srikeit^{(talk ¦ ✉)} 05:36, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

• Delete religioncruft. Danny Lilithborne 07:47, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - I tried Googling various key terms from the article besides the name (founder, ranch name, etc.), found nothing relevant. Non-notable at best. -- Zawersh 07:54, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Well, I was going to AfD it, but first was giving interested parties a courtesy period to explain this. I guess Srikeit beat me to it. On the article talk page Talk:New Beginning Cult I explain that 2 out of 3 books cited wre searched in fulltext and appear to have no reference to this cult, and Google shows zero hits for the relevant search terms. This is definitely a hoax. - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 09:30, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

• Sorry about that. I completely forgot to check the talk page. Well now I owe you one AFD ;)Srikeit^{(talk ¦ ✉)} 09:38, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. Not notable.--Jusjih 14:02, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment for what it's worth, also note the funny business on the article talk page. - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 14:07, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per CrazyRussian. Good research. -- Kjkolb 14:40, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete per nom. Dominick ^(TALK) 15:17, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete per nom. --Andy123 talk 16:15, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Crazynas 17:19, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. -- Malber (talk • contribs) 20:22, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom Zero sharp 20:59, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, possible hoax.--Jersey Devil 00:49, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.