Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NeoAmericanist

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:04, 18 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] NeoAmericanist

Advert. Non-notable (as of yet). 38 hits on Google. First issue released 3 days ago. Was also previously up for deletion --mdd4696 00:55, 12 November 2005 (UTC)

• Keep I think that it should be cleaned up, rather than deleted. --Unsigned vote by 71.96.165.158 2005-11-12 01:34:05
  • Comment: I feel that the article is very well written, and would be quite a good entry on Wikipedia, if the subject ever becomes notable. However, it seems to me that the publication is still in its infancy, and that we should really wait and see whether or not it grows before we give it an encyclopedic article. --mdd4696 01:39, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete: The network it mentions is 3 days old. That makes this article an advertisement or news account or press release. All three are grounds for deletion. Voice of the Shuttle will be interested and should be sought, but Wikipedia is a tertiary source of information. Geogre 03:46, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as NN, ad. - Dalbury (talk) 13:51, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete well written spam, which is better than badly written spam, but not much. Just zis  Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] (W) AfD? 14:18, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete It is a fine advertisement, to be sure. --Anna nym 23:19, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep: It's written well enough and has been edited to focus on being informative rather than an advertisement. bbbilson 23:59, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
  • User's first edit. His second was to the article in question. User:Zoe|^(talk) 05:50, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, nn advertising. User:Zoe|^(talk) 05:48, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. "Informative" is not a priori grounds for a keep vote. Bearcat 06:11, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Non-notable spam. Aaron 01:03, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Non-notable. *drew 12:51, 16 November 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.