Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neo-Gothism

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mailer Diablo 04:15, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Neo-Gothism

The only evidence for this concept is some guy's webpage, with no evidence of notability supplied either of the term "Neo-Gothism" (and only 77 Google hits [1]), or The "Neo-Gothic Art Manifesto". Note, there do exist concepts such as "Neo-Gothic" and "Neo-Gothicism", and I've nothing against someone writing an article on those concepts - but this article appears to be on about something else (i.e., a new movement since the 1980s). Mdwh 22:33, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

Also see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles Moffat. Mdwh 22:40, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. I can't find very much evidence of this being a real movement. Neo-Gothism without quotations returns only 43 links: one is the Wikipedia article, one is the creator's user page, and quite a few are Wikimirrors. The rest seem to be blogs and message boards. As of right now, there simply don't seem to be any reliable sources to base this article on, and even if there were, I'm not at all convinced of the importance or impact of this so-called "movement". Srose (talk) 22:53, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. If you go to the last page the Google hits drop to 12 (duplicates removed), then down to 8 when WP and mirros are eliminated. Not enough coverage to demonstrate that this is a notable movement. BlueValour 02:56, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.