Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neko the Kitty

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No reason to redirect, as it's not likely someone would search for this. --Coredesat 02:52, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Neko the Kitty

Neko the Kitty (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Article asserts no notability of the comic, which fails WP:WEB. Brad Beattie ^(talk) 04:21, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

• Speedy delete - no assertion of notability. So tagged. MER-C 04:38, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. No sign of notability. Also, it's not that good, which doesn't matter, except that endeavors which aren't good tend also to not be notable. I would not speedy this - the article itself is not that bad, give the guy his day in court, also this Neko forum has 500 topics, so somebody is reading it, I guess. Herostratus 06:14, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
• Kill off and redirect to Neko Case, I mean Maneki Neko. ~ trialsanderrors 07:23, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete per MER-C -- lucasbfr ^talk 02:52, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

removes speedy, I assumed the article was new. my bad. -- lucasbfr ^talk 04:53, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. Cute, but not funny not notable. Ultra-Loser ^{[ T ] [ C ]} 03:27, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
• Why a speedy delete? After nearly 2 years in the 'pedia? It seems objective, doesn't seem to be merely promotional. Since the WP is not a bureaucracy, I think we need more than just citing WP:WEB to explain why this page has to go. Someone enlighten me? ^~DBS ^Talk/_Contribs 03:48, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

Well, the article does not mention any notability that might proove it meets either of the 3 criterias listed on WP:WEB. I have not seen much webcomics passing an AfD to be honest. -- lucasbfr ^talk 04:53, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

I perceive a direct conflict from the claims that it's "not notable" (and request for removal) and the template on Neko's talk page stating, This article is part of WikiProject Webcomics, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to webcomics on Wikipedia. (emphasis added) On the sole basis of these two conflicting goals, I'd say keep it. ^~DBS ^Talk/_Contribs 06:03, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

• Delete non-notable. ReverendG 23:46, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, no significance according to verified information from third-party reputable sources, Wikipedia is not an internet guide. Note that WikiProject Webcomics is meant to include every webcomic article, and therefore it includes even those that ought to be deleted. It is not a stamp of quality or importance. Many if not most deleted webcomics articles have been part of our project. -- Dragonfiend 20:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.