Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naughty In The Bed

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Delete per WP:BLP. Xiner (talk, email) 15:13, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Naughty In The Bed

Naughty In The Bed (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

I don't even know what to say about this article. "Before she took out the single "Naughty In the Bed" she already had release the singles global so all the music store chucked out the CD's and gave them back to Gwen, which he kept them just incase she wants to release it again." I'm not quite sure if this is supposed to be vandalism or not, so WP:AGF I suppose. ShadowHalo 04:59, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

• Delete: Article does also fail WP:A, since all the references don't actually go to any charts for the song. This article is completly unreliable, and I too don't know if this article was supposted to be vandalism. Chickyfuzz14^{(user talk)} 05:04, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. I'm still trying to figure it all out. May fall under patent nonsense, or at least borderline. Realkyhick 06:15, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. The image of the single's cover looks like the text has been Photoshopped in. What's more, it misspells the word "naughty". I call shenanigans. —Celithemis 06:16, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy delete hoax. –Pomte 06:43, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete If it is a hoax, you could have slapped a patent nonsense speedy tag on it and saved us some time. --Edokter (Talk) 13:15, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.