Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natun jagat

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 22:00, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Birati Natun Jagat

The page reads like an advert for a non notable charity company from India. The article suggests that the company name is Birati Natun Jagat, which gets 28 hits on google, 6 on MSN. Natun Jagat gets a few more, 408, but these are not to do with this company. Fails WP:CORP. Thε Halo ^Θ 10:24, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

The main topic had been changed and edited.

How to prevent the deletion?

• If you're the author of the article, you would first have to showcase its notability. Start by rerencing reports of the organisation in local newspapers and magazines. Without this, the article will be deleted. Then expand the article on its history, programmes undertaken (in prose), successes, failures, notable people involved, and end with future goals. It has to be well written, well referenced, and have encyclopedic content (as opposed to agendas and proposals) =Nichalp «Talk»= 17:35, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

 AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Deville (Talk) 16:31, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

• Delete for lack of notability or relevance outside a very small community. --DrTorstenHenning 17:05, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete usage of wikipedia for webhosting, WP:NOT User:Yy-bo 17:55, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. There's really not enough to see any notability here. I think it's fair enough that articles start small and imperfectly formed (I started one on the Vigil India Movement last week), but there always needs to be a sense of showing why the organisation matters beyond its own backyard.Mereda 07:22, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.